Gran Colombia colors
Comparison← Back

The European Union Model: Could Gran Colombia Become Latin America's EU?

Petro's explicit comparison to Europe offers a template—and a warning.

"On these there would be a Grancolombiano Parliament, a Court of Justice and Government Council, like in the European Union or the federal United States."
— Gustavo Petro, January 2026

When Petro outlined his confederation proposal, he explicitly compared it to the European Union. The comparison is instructive—both for what it suggests is possible and for the challenges it reveals.

How the EU Works

The European Union is the world's most successful experiment in regional integration. 27 member states have pooled sovereignty in specific areas while retaining national independence in others. Key features include:

What Petro Proposed

Petro's January 2026 outline suggested three institutions:

Notably, Petro emphasized "autonomous nations"—suggesting something closer to the EU's respect for national sovereignty than a federal merger like the United States.

Advantages of the EU Model

Proven Feasibility

The EU demonstrates that regional integration across diverse nations is possible. If France and Germany—which fought three wars in 70 years—can share institutions, why not Colombia and Venezuela?

Flexible Membership

EU membership isn't all-or-nothing. Countries can join the single market without adopting the euro. They can participate in some programs while opting out of others. A Gran Colombia confederation could offer similar flexibility.

Preserved Sovereignty

EU members remain sovereign nations with their own armies, foreign policies (mostly), and domestic governance. Integration is selective, not total. This addresses fears of national identity erasure.

Challenges and Differences

Different Starting Point

The EU emerged from the ashes of World War II, with powerful incentives for peace. It built on decades of incremental integration—the Coal and Steel Community, the Common Market, the Single European Act. Gran Colombia would need to create similar momentum from a standing start.

Scale Difference

The EU has 27 members and 450 million people. Gran Colombia would start with 4 members and 104 million. Smaller scale makes some things easier (fewer interests to balance) but reduces collective weight.

Economic Disparities

Gran Colombia members have significant economic differences—Panama's GDP per capita is roughly three times Venezuela's. The EU manages similar disparities (Luxembourg vs. Bulgaria), but it took decades of regional development funds.

Institutional Weakness

Latin American institutions are generally weaker than European ones. Building a supranational court and parliament requires trust in institutions that hasn't always existed in the region.

A Gran Colombia Roadmap

If Gran Colombia were to follow the EU model, progression might look like:

  1. Phase 1: Free trade area eliminating tariffs
  2. Phase 2: Customs union with common external tariffs
  3. Phase 3: Common market with free movement of goods, services, capital
  4. Phase 4: Political institutions—Parliament, Court, Council
  5. Phase 5 (maybe): Free movement of people, shared citizenship

This would take decades. But the EU took decades too. The question is whether to start.

The Bottom Line

The EU proves regional integration is possible among diverse nations with different economies, different politics, and different histories. It also shows how hard it is—Brexit demonstrated that integration can be reversed.

A Gran Colombia confederation wouldn't replicate the EU exactly. It would adapt the model to Latin American conditions. But Petro is right to point to Europe as proof of concept.

If they can do it, we can too.

Sources

  • • European Commission institutional documentation
  • • EU integration history resources
  • • Petro's January 2026 confederation proposal